Showing posts with label Ireland. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ireland. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 10, 2020

Ezekiel Harlan (1679-1731), Quaker, Yeoman, and Land Speculator




Generic Colonial era sailing ship


My eighth great-grandfather was the oldest son of George Harland and Elizabeth Duck, who I wrote about in January. He was born in the Parish of Donaghcloney, County Down, Ireland. He was only eight years old when his parents brought their family to the Pennsylvania colony in 1687. He had eight younger siblings, the first three of which were also born in Ireland and made the long journey to America with Ezekiel, his parents, and his uncle Michael. For a listing of his sisters and brothers, please see the post on his father, HERE.


A word about the dating used in this post before I continue with the story. Before 1752 England and its colonies used the Julian Calendar, in which the first day of the new year was March 25, and not the Gregorian Calendar (used today) in which the first day of the new year is January 1. While the Quakers followed the calendar commonly used by England, the Quakers designate months by numbers, such that in the Julian calendar First month (or 1st mo. or 1) was March. In writing dates in this essay that occur before 1752, I’ll state what the date would be in today’s calendar and then, in parentheses, I’ll include the date as I found it in the source used. [For a more in-depth explanation of the Julian calendar transition to the Gregorian calendar, and Quaker calendar see my post, Dating Induced Headaches for the Family Historian: Julian, Gregorian, and Quaker Calendars.]  Now on with the story of Ezekiel Harlan!


The main Irish ports from which ships sailed to William Penn’s new Colony were Cork and Waterford. Although while vessels did sail directly from those Irish ports, more often people took passage in ships which sailed from Whitehaven, Liverpool, or Bristol, in England, which then stopped at the Irish ports for passengers and cargo on the way. Philadelphia was the main port of entry in America from Ireland, but many settlers landed at Newcastle, on the Delaware River, and some at points in Maryland and Virginia.


The voyage from Ireland to the American colonies was a long one, ranging from six weeks to three months depending on the weather and sea conditions. Ships were often driven far off course by contrary winds and carried as far south as the West Indies. Additionally, dangerous diseases, such as smallpox, frequently occurred, and many passengers died at sea. George Harland and his wife Elizabeth (Duck) saw this new land as such a new hope and opportunity that they chose to risk their young family, children aged 4 to 8 years, in the hold of one of these ships for the long voyage to Pennsylvania. The Harlans landed and settled in Newcastle (and dropped the final “d” from their last name). Newcastle was then the largest city in the lower three counties of Pennsylvania (which later became the state of Delaware).


The first monthly meeting of friends in Pennsylvania occurred in January 1681/2, five or six years before the Harlan family arrived, thus the monthly meetings were well established when the family arrived. The congregations of the Quaker meetings  already in Pennsylvania, especially the Philadelphia monthly meeting, took special care of new immigrant Friends, welcoming them and advising them as to where to settle, and often giving needed financial assistance, especially in the payment of passage money, lending the new immigrants the money to pay the bill the ships master charged to bring them to the colony, or buying out their debt and taking them into service to work out their redemption. Once the immigrants chose their land and secured title, the family would quickly move to their chosen land so that their efforts in settlement will be well underway by the time winter season began.


The Landing of William Penn, by Jean Leon Gerome Ferris (1863-1930), depicting Penn's arrival at New Castle.
The Landing of William Penn, by Jean Leon Gerome Ferris (1863-1930), depicting Penn's arrival at New Castle.
In the Public Domain



The Harlans initially settled on the west side of Brandywine Creek, in the Christiana Hundred in Newcastle when Ezekiel was eight or nine years old. The Christiana Hundred was one of the original Hundreds created in 1682 and was named for the Christiana River that flows along its southern boundary. A Hundred was an old English term for a portion of land, like a County, was governed by a particular administrative or legal body. As they were joining an already existing community, there were neighbors within a reasonable distance to help and to provide more security than going further inland by themselves. In the summer they attended the Newark meeting at Valentine Hollingsworth’s house and, in the winter, because travel was treacherous, they were allowed to hold meetings in the homes of their own community.  


The whole family would have worked together to clear the forest on their land to build a house. The first dwelling built by new immigrants to the land was often a log cabin built from the trees they felled in order to make the clearing in which to build the cabin. It was built of long logs placed horizontally upon one another and notched together at the corners. The spaces between the lots were filled in or kinked with stones or wedges of wood and then plastered over with mortar or clay. The roof was covered with boards or all shingles, either pinned by wood wooden pins or held in place by weight timbers. A huge stone fireplace and chimney were built into one side of the house to be used for cooking and heat. The English and Irish Quakers made their log houses square not rectangular. As a family became more settled, and survived the first winter, with crops harvested and re-planted, they added a second floor. As they became more prosperous, the families would also build a larger and more comfortable in addition to the house of brick or stone.  A log house built, about 25 years later, in 1715, by Ezekiel’s younger brother Joshua still stands in Kennett Township, Chester County, PA and is on the National Register of Historic Places. See the picture below of Joshua’s house.


Joshua Harlan's Log House, 26' x 26',  built 1715, with 1815 19' x 15' stone addition.
Near Kennett Square, Kennett Twp, Chester County, Pennsylvania, USA, about a half-mile west of Fairville.
Smallbones / CC0 

George Harlan moved his family about ten miles up the creek further into Pennsylvania to Kennett Township in Chester County Pennsylvania in 1698 after buying 470 acres of land up there. Ezekiel was 19 at the time of that move. The move would’ve been done with packhorses as there were no real roads and a wagon would not make it through the forest, even along the creek bank. The women and children and farm and household effects were loaded on the packhorses, with the men traveling on foot, leading the horses and driving their animal herds and flocks along before them. Again, they cleared land and built a new home. 


In the summer months George and his sons, including Ezekial, were busy clearing and planting their land, and keeping their livestock. In winter, if it was too cold or stormy for outside work, the male members of the family would do such tasks indoors as making shoes for the family, repairing horse tack, heating iron over the fire and berating it into farming or household implements, and making household furniture and utensils. The women of the household were even busier than the men. They would help the men in the fields and in caring for the animals, but also did the cooking for the family, washed dishes and clothes, made butter, made candles and soap and clothes, sewed quilts, picked, carded, and spun wool and flax, knit, worked in the kitchen garden, and had babies and cared for the children.


The produce and handicrafts of the farm were carried to Philadelphia, Chester, or Newcastle, on horseback to be sold in markets or fairs or exchanged for goods the household could not make themselves. They also met and socialized with other Quakers on these trips.  Despite the difficulty in travel the Friends visited with each other regularly at harvests and huskings, barn and house raisings, weddings and funerals, and at the twice weekly meetings on First-day and Fifth-day. Quakers also met for quarterly and yearly business meetings that brought in Friends from distant areas, which led to more socializing. The Quarterly Meetings lasted for several days.  The Yearly Meeting for the Harlans’ area of Pennsylvania and Delaware, as well as parts of New Jersey and Maryland, was held in Philadelphia for a week or more each year.


The twice weekly Meetings were very important in a Quaker’s life for worship and quiet socializing. At the meeting, the congregation sat on hard, unpainted, un-cushioned benches, with women on one side and the men on the other. After some moments of silent worship, from the raised seats in the gallery facing the body of the meeting [congregation] where the ministers and elders sat, a minister would stand and give a spiritual message. Often the speaker was a travelling friend from England, Ireland, or other distant places.


In 1700, when Ezekiel was 21 years of age, he married Mary Bezer (in the below record, Mary Bazer), by ceremony of Friends at the Concord Monthly Meeting in what is now Delaware County Pennsylvania. Her family had come to the colony in 1683 when she was only 1-year-old, settling in the area of that Meeting.


Ezekial Harlan & Mary Bazer, Marriage Intention,  13 Jan 1700 (the 13th of  the 11th month 1700)  Minutes of Concord Monthly Meeting, Delaware PA
Ezekial Harlan & Mary Bazer, Marriage Intention,
13 Jan 1700 (the 13th of  the 11th month 1700)
Minutes of Concord Monthly Meeting, Delaware PA


Quakers required that marriage took place within the auspices of the meeting; it was not something to engage in lightly or quickly. Companionship and friendship were viewed as the proper base of a marriage. Romance was not condemned but was conditioned upon a shared devotion to God. Men and women chose their own spouses after months of corresponding and visiting. Parents could not force their children into marriage. However, a man and woman were required to have the approval of parents and their meetings to marry.  To do this, the two first appeared before the local women’s meeting. The records show the two chose the Concord Meeting that Mary attended. The women’s meeting appointed two people to meet with the couple separately to question them to ensure that neither of them were already married, were non‐Quakers, or were otherwise unsuitable spouses. Friends believed that the wife and husband should be supportive of the other’s spiritual growth. Both partners were also expected to be capable of contributing to their household and to raise their children as Quakers. If the couple were found to be “clear of all entanglements” they were allowed to marry according to the good order of Friends. The couple then had to appear at at least two Men’s Meetings to declare their Intent to Marry before obtaining approval to do so. These early Friends did not believe that a priest or magistrate, or even a Quaker meeting, could perform a marriage. Only God could do that. Marriages took place in a silent meeting where the man and woman rose and affirmed their commitment to each other before God. Those present signed a certificate witnessing that the marriage had actually taken place. Careful records of witnesses were kept so courts would recognize the marriage and the legitimacy of the children in it, to avoid later challenges to inheritance.


Ezekiel and Mary had only one child, William, my seventh great-grandfather, who was born 1 Nov 1702 (9, 1, 1702) , died 22 October 1783, m. 14 Feb 1721 (12, 14, 1721). Unfortunately, Mary died shortly after his birth, in 1702 in Christiana Hundred, New Castle, Pennsylvania.


Four years later, in 1705/6, Ezekiel married Ruth Buffington in a ceremony of Friends. They had six children: Ezekiel, born July 19, 1707 (5, 19, 1707), died 1754, married Hannah Oborn, December 23, 1724 (10, 23, 1724); Mary, born June 12, 1709 (4, 12, 1709), died June 7, 1750 (4, 7, 1750), married Daniel Webb, November 28, 1727 (9, 28, 1727); Elizabeth, born July 19, 1713, died ?, married William White, August 8, 1728 (6, 8, 1728); Joseph, born August 14, 1721, died ?, married Hannah Roberts May 21, 1740 (3, 21, 1740); Ruth, born March 11, 1723 (1, 11, 1723), died ?, married Daniel Leonard, May 28, 1740 (3, 28, 1740); and Benjamin, born October 7, 1729, died October 1752 (8 Mo. 1752), at sea, unmarried.


Ezekiel and Ruth lived in Kennett in Chester County, on property directly north of the Old Kennett Meetinghouse. The Old Kennett Monthly Meetinghouse was built in 1710 by Ezekiel Harlan, on land deeded from William Penn. The bicentennial history for the old Kennett meetinghouse states that he “must have” conveyed the land for the meetinghouse, but the deed had been lost. Ezekiel was described in a few sources as a farmer and a land speculator. He dealt in lands throughout Chester County and adjoining counties. He was appointed constable for the Township in 1706. In 1715, he was the heaviest taxpayer in the Township, paying 12 shillings and sixpence, or approximately six days wages for a skilled tradesman. 12 shillings and six pence appear to be about double what most of the other people listed in the record paid that year.


I lost him for about fifteen years after that. But in 1731, he went to England, regarding what most sources described as “tradition holds was business in connection with his father’s estate.” Before he left for England, in an abundance of caution, he drafted his will. This was a tradition before any long sea voyage. He survived the sea-crossing to England, but while there, he contracted smallpox and died, at age 51, on 15 June 1731 (15 of 4 mo. 1731). He was buried two days later near Bunnhill Fields, in Devonshire, England.

The Will of Ezekiel Harlan, signed 14 Nov 1730. Probated 31 Jan 1732.
(found in PA Wills and Probate Records, 1683-1993, Collection on Ancestry.com)


The Will of Ezekiel Harlan (transcription)

In the name of God Amen. I Ezekiel Harlan of the County of Chester in the province of pennsivania in America Yeoman being in reasonable health of body and of perfect mind and memory Thanks be to God for the same and being about to take a voyage into old England and Calling to mind the uncertainty of this life for the settling of my Temporal affairs I do make and ordain this my last Will and Testament in manner and form following that is to say first committing my soul to God I will order and appoint my boddy to be buried in a Decent matter at ye Discretion of my Executrix hereinafter mentioned and Touching such Worldly Estate and Substance were with God has Blessed me I give and appoint and bequeath to my son William Harlan the sum of five Shillings and to my son Ezekiel Harlan the sum of five shillings and my daughter Mary the wife of Daniel Webb the sum of five Shillings and to my daughter Elizabeth the wife of William White the sum of five Shillings and my sons Joseph and Benjamin Harlan and to their heirs and assigns forever I Give and Bequeath Five hundred acres of land to be equally divided between them share and share alike that is to say 250 acres each to be laid out at the direction of my executrix hereinafter named which said Five hundred acres of land is to be part and parcell of the Tact of Land which I now Dwell upon and to my daughter Ruth Harlan the sum of Fifty pounds Current money of pennsilvania or the value in goods at the market price and in any case any of my last mentioned three children viz Joseph, Benja, and Ruth should happen to Dye before they attain the age of Twenty one yeares or marry then and it is my will that the share or shares of each Child or Children so dying shall be Equally Divided between the survivor or survivors of them and my Executrix Share and Share alike.

Item I give and Bequeath unto my Dear and well Beloved wife Ruth Harlan the remaining part or parcel of my plantation or tract of land on which I now dwell after the said Five hundred acres is laid out to my two sons Joseph and Benjamin in the manner aforesaid Together with all my personall Estate of what kind or sort soever in order the better to Enable her to pay and satisfy all my just Debts and funeral expenses and towards bringing up maintaining and Educating of my children during their minority and lastly do a ordain constitute and appoint my dear and well beloved wife Ruth Harlan soul executrix of this my last will and Testament here by Revoking and making void all other and Former Will or Wills heretofore made or published by me.

In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal this Fourteenth day of November in the year of our Lord God one thousand seven hundred and Thirty.
Signed Sealed                                                                                              Ezekiel Harlan. (Seal) 
and published in the
Presence of

Joseph Robinson.
William Webb Junior
Wm Henderson.

An inventory of Ezekiel Harlan’s goods, filed January, 1/31/32, and signed by Joseph Gibbons and James Taylor, places the value of his worldly effects at the time of his death at 208 pounds 17 shillings. Appraised on February 1, 1743/44, and signed by Jno. Marshall, Benjamin Taylor and Samuel Sellars, the amount of the estate which passed to his widow, Ruth, amounted to 182 pounds, 19 shillings, six cents. In the report of the Executrix filed on 5 May 1734 by Ezekiel’s widow, Ruth Harlan, she listed 37 people to whom money was paid in the administration of the will. Ruth outlived Ezekiel by about twelve years. She died before 2 Feb 1743, which is when her will was probated.

The Will of Ruth Harlan (transcription)

Be it known to all men by these presents that I Ruth Harlan of Kennett in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and forty-three being sick & weak of body but of sound and perfect Disposing mind & memory do make and ordain this my Last Will & Testament in manner and form following that is to say first and principally when it shall have pleased Almighty God to call my Soul to his mercy that my Boddy be Decently interred at the Discretion of my Executors hereinafter named, and in the next place my will mind an order is that all my just Debts and funeral expenses shall be paid and discharged as soon as possible after my decease And after all my Just Debts and funeral expenses are paid and discharged I do devise and bequeath unto my son Ezekiel Harlan of West Marlborough in the said county and province the sum of Five shillings to be paid to him or his assigns within one year after my decease. Also I Devise and Bequeath unto my son Joseph Harlan of Kennett aforesaid the sum of Five shillings to be paid under him or his assigns within one year after my decease and also I Give and Bequeath unto my son Benjamin Harlan the sum of Five shillings to be paid under him when he shall have arrived at the age of 21 years. Allso I Devis and bequeath unto my daughter Mary Webb & relict of Daniell Webb Late of Kennett deceased the sum of Five pounds to be paid to her or her heirs within one year after my decease. Allso I devise & Bequeath unto my said daughter Mary Webb my sattin Gown to be delivered to her immediately after my decease. Allso I devise and bequeath unto my daughter Elizabeth White my Gown made of wool & worsted and my quilted Petticoat and the Remainder of my wearing apparrall l I give Devise and Bequeath to my daughter Ruth the wife of Daniel Leonard. Allso I get devise and bequeath the wooll of my sheepe to be Equally divided between my two Daughters namely the above-mentioned Elizabeth White the wife of William White and Ruth the wife of Daniel Leonard. Allso I give devise and Bequeath unto my said daughter Ruth Leonard the seventeen acres of Land by me reserved out of the Lands left me by my husband Ezekiel Harlan Deceased & the House where I now Dwell & allso the orchard and a piece of Meadow called the Calf Passture & a piece of Wood Land at the Discretion of my executors so that the whole of the land in orchard Meadow Ground Woodland &c shall not exceed Seventeen acres To hold to the said Ruth Leonard during her Natural Life and after her decease I Give devise and bequeath the seventeen acres of Land & Premises above-mentioned to my son Benjamin & his heirs and Assigns forever, and the Remainder or Overplus of my Estate after my Just Debts funeral expenses & the above mentioned Legacies are paid and discharged I do Will in order to be Equally Divided between my two above mentioned Daughters, namely, Elizabeth White and Ruth Leonard.

Also my will mind and desire is that my son Benjamin be put to apprentice in a Convenient Time after my Decease to my Brotherinlaw Charles Turner of Birmingham untill he be the age of Twenty years to learn the Trade and art of Cordwainer & I do hereby constitute and appoint my son Ezekiel Harlan above-mentioned to be the sole Executor of this my Last Will and testament and my soninlaw* William Harlan of West Marlborough aforesaid to be Overseer & Trustee for the performance thereof but without the power of admintr except in case it shall so happen my son Ezekiel shall die before he shall have accomplished and fulfilled the performance of his Administration & Executorship to this my Last Will & Testament.
And I do hereby revoke Disallow & make void all and all manner & other and former Wills & Testaments by me heretofore made, hereby ratifying and confirming and declaring this and no other to be my Last Will & Testament.
In witness whereof together with the publication hereof I have hereunto set my hand and seal the day in the year first above written.
JOSEPH TAYLOR. Her mark.
Witnesses: John Walker. RuTH X Harlan. (Seal)
Thomas Worrall. Mark
proved February 2, 1733/4

*"soninlaw" is now called stepson


---------------

Quaker meeting records, 1681-1935, ancestry.com, Provo, Utah, USA;  Estate Papers, 1713-1810; Author: Chester County (Pennsylvania). Register of Wills; Probate Place: Chester, Pennsylvania, collection at Ancestry.com, Provo, Utah, USA; Wills Proved at Philadelphia 1682-1692, pp. 51-52. No. 14, John Bezer, Publication of the Genealogical Society of Pennsylvania, Volume 1, 1896, No. 2; History and Genealogy of the Harland Family in America, and particularly of the descendants of George and Michael Harlan, who settled in Chester County PA, 1687, compiled by Alpheus Harlan (The Lord Baltimore Press 1914); The History of Chester County, Pennsylvania, with genealogical and biographical sketches, by J. Smith Futhey and Gilbert Cope (Philadelphia, Louis H. Everts 1881); Immigration of the Irish Quakers in Pennsylvania, 1682-1750, with their early History in Ireland, by Albert Cook Myers, member of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania (The Author, Swarthmore PA 1902); Bi-centennial of Old Kennett Meeting House, Kennett Township, Chester Co., Pa., seventh day, ninth month, twenty-fourth (Walter H Jenkins, 15th and Cherry Streets, Philadelphia); The History of the Society of Friends in America, Vol. II: Pennsylvania and New Jersey, by James Bowden (London: W & F.G. Cash, 1854); https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/currency-converter/#currency-result; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Kennett_Meetinghouse ; https://www.southernchestercountyweeklies.com/news/the-many-quaker-meetinghouses-of-chester-county/article_db570d2d-e806-5dc3-a313-6e0b36998a32.html; http://www.phmc.state.pa.us/portal/communities/pa-heritage/our-first-friends-early-quakers.html







Thursday, January 23, 2020

George Harland/Harlan, 1650-1714, Quaker Yeoman Farmer

Kennett Monthly Meeting, Pennsylvania, record of baptism of George Harlan
Click to make bigger.


George Harland, my 9th great grandfather, was the second son of James Harland, a yeoman* and a member of the Episcopal Church in Bishoprick, nigh Durham, England. James was born around 1625, and lived his entire life in that area of England. While he was likely married, I have no idea who his wife was as only James is listed in the baptism record of his three sons, Thomas, George, and Michael  -- I don’t know if there were any other children in the family. Thomas was born about 1649 (m (1). Katharine Bullock [?-1690], April 7, 1680 (7, 2 mo, 1680) by ceremony of Friends at Sego, Armagh, Ireland; m. (2) Alice Foster [?-1702], Armagh, Ireland, dd. ?). George was the second son, born in approximately 1650 and baptized on March 11, 1650 ** (11 First 1650) in the Episcopal Church; And Michael born about 1653 (m. Dina Dixson in Pennsylvania, dd. 1728). All three brothers were baptized in at the Episcopal Church at Monkwearmoth, Durham, England.


Climbing My Family Tree: St. Peters Church & Monkwearmouth Monastery, built 675 AD. Public Domain.
St. Peters Church & Monkwearmouth Monastery, built 675 AD. Public Domain.
Click to make bigger.


George lived with his parents in Bishoprick, nigh Durham, England until he reached adulthood. When he reached adulthood, he and his brothers moved, with some others, to County Down, Ireland. I have been unable to find anything that says definitively whether he converted to Quakerism while in England or after he moved to Ireland. I know that he was a member of the Quaker meeting in Ireland. However, the move to Ireland would make sense if they had converted to Quakerism while in England.


The Religious Society of Friends (commonly known as the Quakers), was founded by George Fox around the time that George Harland was born. By 1660, it is estimated there were 50,000 Quakers in England. Among the new and radical spiritual beliefs held by the Quakers were that a direct experience with God was available to all people without mediation through hired clergy; that God could move anyone to speak and that all Christians could and should be ministers, including women, but they had no official pastors or priest; and that the sacraments were purely spiritual and they did not take physical communion with wine and bread or baptize with water. These views were not popular with either Catholic or Protestant clergy. The Friends also annoyed civil authorities and the upper classes with their belief in the equality of all. The Quakers lived this belief by refusing to use honorifics in addressing others (addressing all simply by their name), refusing to salute others, and refusing to remove their hats before a social superior among other things. They also refused to take oaths, because they believed people should always tell the truth, which left the King doubting their loyalty since they refused to swear fealty to him. Additionally, the Quakers refused to pay tithes to the established church, which were required of all people.


The century before the establishment of the Quakers was a time of religious conflict between Catholics and Protestants, starting with Henry VIII’s creation of the Church of England and split from the Catholic Church, because he wanted to get divorced, and followed by alternating Protestant and Catholic monarchs who, supported by the Church of England (also known as the Anglican Church), encouraged persecution of religions other than their own, and culminating in the Thirty Years War and the English Civil War both of which were rooted in religious differences. It was not a time of religious tolerance. Between 1661 and 1664, Parliament passed a series of laws which basically made it illegal to be a practicing Quaker. For the next two decades Quakers were heavily persecuted, while they persevered in practicing their faith.  Fox stated that there were seldom less than a thousand Quakers imprisoned during these years (total imprisoned 13,562, plus 338 deaths and 200 deported as slaves to the West Indies); Fox himself spent five years in jail.


Quakers had been moving to Ireland since the 1650s, trying to escape the persecution by the Anglican church and Parliament, with a second wave occurring in the 1670’s. The first Quaker meeting in Ireland was held in Lurgan, in County Armagh, in 1655. It’s quite possible that George Harlan and his brothers chose to move to the Lurgan area because they knew of the number of Quakers already in the area. They moved to County Down, probably to the Parish of Donaghcloney,  which immediately abuts the neighboring parishes of Shankill and Seagoe in County Armagh in northern Ireland (at that point Ireland was unified, northern is just a geographical description). While I don’t know exactly when George moved to Ireland, I know he was there by 1678.


While living in County Down, George Harlan met Elizabeth Duck, of Lurgan, who was 10 years younger than him having been born in 1660. Elizabeth and George married, by ceremony of Friends, on November 27, 1678 (twenty seventh day of ninth month, 1678), in the house of Marke Wright, in the parish of Shankill, County of Armagh. Present among the witnesses was George’s brother Thomas.


Climbing My Family Tree IQuaker Marriage Record for George Harland & Elizabeth Duck (Nov 27, 1678))
Quaker Marriage Record for Geoge Harland & Elizabeth Duck (Nov 27, 1678)
Click to make Bigger

Part 1 -Transcription of
Quaker Marriage Record for Geoge Harland & Elizabeth Duck (Nov 27, 1678)
Click to make bigger

Part 2 -Transcription of
Quaker Marriage Record for Geoge Harland & Elizabeth Duck (Nov 27, 1678), witnesses.
Click to make bigger





George and Elizabeth had nine children, the first four of which were born in Ireland: Ezekiel [b.  August 16, 1679 (6, 16, 1679); d. June 15, 1731 (4, 15, 1731); m. Mary Bezer and Ruth Buffington]; Hannah [b. April 4, 1681 (2, 4, 1681); d. ?; m. Samuel Hollingsworth]; Moses [b. February 20, 1683, (12, 20, 1683); d. 1747; m. Margaret Ray]; Aaron [b. December 24, 1685 (10, 24, 1685); d. November 1732 (9 mo. 1732); m. Sarah Heald].

In moving to Ireland, George did not escape the official persecution of Quakers which also spread to Ireland. Many Quakers in the area had their goods and crops confiscated, or were imprisoned, for nonpayment of tithes to the Church of Ireland or other “failures to conform”. We know that George refused to pay the required tithe to the Church. The “tithe”, was essentially a church tax and was to be a tenth of one’s income; it was the main source of income for the official Church. Quakers objected to the tithe on two levels, believing in their own practices that spiritual guidance and worship should be free, and, believing that as non-Anglicans they should not have to support the Anglican Church. Because George refused to pay the required tithe, the government forcibly seized what they determined to be an equivalent amount of his crops in lieu of payment. Noted in A Great Cry of Oppression by William Stockdale, in 1680, “George Harland, of County Down had taken from him in Tithe, by Daniel MacConnell, twelve stooks and a half of oats, three stooks and a half of barley, and five loads of hay, all worth ten shillings and ten pence."  At FindMyPast(.)com I found the original Quaker Meeting record of that confiscation. I also found that George was subject to nearly yearly confiscations. In 1682, George Harland “had taken from him for a tithe by Thomas Usher & Donald McConnol four loads of hay, sixteen stooks and a half of wheat & twenty-four stooks of oats, all worth one pound thirteen shillings six pence.” In 1683, he “had taken from him for tithe by Donnoll Mark Connoll and Johns Spont, fishmongers, two loads of hay out of his hay fields, worth two shillings.” In 1684, George “had taken from him by Hugh MacConnoll for the said priest, one stook, two sheafs of [?], eighteen stooks, nine sheafs of oats, two stooks and a half of barley, and two loads of hay. All worth 15 shillings, four pence. All on account of tithe which for conscience’s sake they could not pay.” I’ve no reason to believe the tithe confiscations ceased in 1684 but these are the records that remain. It had to be aggravating to lose so much of his farming labor’s product every year to a support religion of which he was not a member. I don’t know whether he was ever imprisoned for his refusal but if he had been it could explain why there are no more confiscation records for the next two years.

Wheat sheaves near King's Somborne, England arranged into a stook.- Trish Steel [CC BY-SA ]


About this time George would have heard about William Penn’s new colony, Pennsylvania, in the New World. In 1681, King Charles II gave over 45,000 square miles of his American land holdings to Penn to pay the debts the king owed to Penn's deceased father, and in 1682 Penn obtained from the Duke of York both a 10,000 year lease and an absolute deed of Feoffment (sale of real property) for the town of New Castle and a 12-mile circle around it, and a 10,000 year lease and an absolute deed of Feoffment for all of the land south of the twelve mile circle down to Cape Henlopen. This land included the present-day states of Pennsylvania and Delaware. Penn planned to found a colony based on Quaker principles, a "Holy Experiment" as he called it, and implementing a new form of more egalitarian government. The colonial government, established in 1682 by Penn's Frame of Government, consisted of an appointed governor, the proprietor (William Penn), a 72-member Provincial Council, and a larger representative Provincial Assembly. Starting in 1681 broadsheets promoting the venture were distributed widely at Quaker meetings in Ireland. Quakers began moving to the colony.  As more people moved to the Colony, letters from the pioneers were sent home to Ireland, describing their life in America, were passed around at Quaker Meetings. The idea of a new start in a friendly land led George and Michael Harlan to think that their future lay across the ocean in the New World.

Some Irish Quakers went out to Penn’s Colony as indentured servants, selling themselves into temporary servitude usually for about four years in order to pay the costs of their transportation to Pennsylvania. Some, known as redemptioners, made agreements with the shipmaster to be sold after their arrival. The redemptioners could not be sold out of Pennsylvania without their free consent given before a judge. At the end of their service, if their behavior had been good, they received a suit of clothes, a set of tools for the field in which they were engaged, and a sum of money. Those that came over with the first purchasers of land in the colony were allowed by Penn to receive fifty acres of land at a rent, paid to Penn, of a half-penny per acre per year. Due to harsh treatment and dissatisfaction with the conditions of servitude, the redemptioners often ran away, and newspapers of the time were full of advertisements of rewards for the return of their indented servants, and much of the business of the provincial courts was hearing complaints of masters and servants. Unlike the redemptioners, the Harland brothers had enough money to purchase land in Penn’s colony before they left Ireland, but there are indications that George employed indented servants in his household in the New World.  

Province of PA - No machine-readable author provided.
Kmusser assumed (based on copyright claims). [CC BY-SA]


In early 1687, George Harland, his wife, his four eldest children, and his brother Michael left from Belfast on a ship for Pennsylvania (his brother Thomas remained in Ireland). In 1686, George had bought lands in the southeastern corner of Pennsylvania, known as the Lower Three Counties, in an area now belonging to New Castle, Delaware. Other land in the area was bought at that time in the name of his father James, and brother Thomas, although neither ever moved to America. They settled on the west side of the Brandywine Creek in the Christiana Hundred section of Newcastle county, near the current town of Centerville. After moving to Pennsylvania, George and his brother dropped the D from their last name. Here, George and Elizabeth had five more children: Rebecca [b. October 17, 1688 (8, 17, 1688); d. October 17, 1775 (8, 17, 1775); m. William Webb]; Deborah [b. October 28, 1690 (8, 28, 1690); d. ??; m. Joshua Calvert]; James [b. October 19, 1692 (8, 19, 1692); d. ??; m. Elizabeth  ??]; Joshua [b. January 15, 1696 (11, 15, 1696); d. July 1744 (5 Mo. 1744); m. Mary Heald].

Initially, they belonged to and, in the Summer, attended the Newark Meeting in the Lower Three Counties. However, George and his family were too far from the Newark Meeting for regular and punctual attendance, especially in the winter, given the dangerousness of fording the river and made a request on behalf of his neighbors and himself for a Meeting beyond the Brandywine to be established for that reason; the formation of the Centre Meeting was granted in what is now Centerville, New Castle county, Delaware but was then the southeastern corner of Pennsylvania. For several years they held a meeting in homes in their community, often at George Harlan’s home.  George was put on a committee with Thomas Hollingsworth, Alphonsus Kirk, and Samuel Groves “to take the oversight of the building of ye Centre Meeting House requesting ye with all convenient speed to let out ye work to some workmen in order it may be more speedily done and return an acctt to ye next meeting how they proceed.” However, the Meeting House was not built until 1711.

In 1695, George Harlan was elected to the Provincial Assembly from New Castle County. Provincial Assembly elections were held annually in colonial Pennsylvania, and Assembly representatives were elected to serve a one year term. When William Penn formed the colony’s government, he created the Frame of 1682, which described a parliament consisting of two houses. The upper house, or the Provincial Council, consisted of 72 members who were the first fifty purchasers of 5,000 acres or more in the colony and had the exclusive power to propose legislation. They were also authorized to nominate all officers in church and state and supervise financial and military affairs through committees. The lower house, or the Provincial Assembly, consisted of smaller landowners. It had no power to initiate legislation but could accept or reject the council's legislative proposal only. However, in the first meeting of the Assembly the Frame of 1682 was voted down. When the Assembly convened in 1682, the Assembly sought to enlarge its role and insisted that it be granted to power to initiate legislation, as it demanded when it rejected the Frame of 1682. A compromise frame of government, called the Frame of 1683, was eventually approved by the Assembly. It provided that all laws should be passed "by the Governor and the freemen in Council and Assembly met", and granted the governor a right to approve or veto. This 1683 Frame of Government was still in effect when George served his term as the representative from Newcastle county in 1695.


In about 1698, George bought 470 acres of land further up the Brandywine Creek, and moved his family and settled in Kennett Square, Chester County, Pennsylvania (the area is now in Pennsbury Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania). While living there, George’s neighbors were a settlement of Native Americans who lived across the river in the “Great Bend” of the Brandywine River. After the Native Americans abandoned their settlement, he obtained, in 1701, a grant of 200 additional acres of land in the Bend, which was given to him for the “charge great trouble and cost he had born” in fencing and maintaining the fence for the Native Americans while living there.


Climbing My Family Tree: Map of Chester County Meeting Houses
Map of Chester County Quaker Meeting Houses
Click to make bigger


In 1712 George was again elected to the Provincial Assembly, this time from Chester County. This time the Assembly was more powerful than it had been during his last term. A new Frame of Government called the Charter of Privileges was granted in 1701. It permitted Assembly members certain privileges, liberties, or powers, never before granted by Penn, most particularly, the power to enact legislation. Penn had been called back to England and was afraid of the possibility of a takeover of his proprietary colony by the Crown, and reasoned that his colony could defend itself with this new power. Another provision elevated much of the Assembly’s power to that of the governor and judiciary, creating a tripartite government. The governor’s role was reduced to management status, but still retained veto power while the Provincial Council was reduced to an advisory body to the governor. Additionally, as of 1704, the Lower Counties of Pennsylvania had withdrawn from the state and formed their own state of Delaware.


On the first day of March 1713 (1, 1, 1713), George Harlan deeded 203 acres to his son-in-law, William Webb, husband of daughter Rebecca, for a consideration of 30 pounds. On the ninth day of the same month, for “consideration of the natural affection and fatherly love which he hath” and “for divers other good causes and valuable considerations” he deeded 200 acres each to his sons James and Joshua. George died in July 1714 (Fifth Month 1714). The date of death of his wife, Elizabeth, is not known, but I know she died before he did, because in his will he requested that he be buried beside his “deare wife in the new burying grounds.”


George left a will, dated April 20, 1714 (twentieth day of the second month called Aprill in the year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred & ffourteen) and an inventory was done of his property prior to distribution according to its terms. These documents give a good insight into the living conditions of a prominent Quaker family of the time. The will is how I learned that he had an indented servant. In it, he says that he “give[s] unto my servant woman named Mary Matthews at the expiration of her time one cow & calf & one young mare not less than three years old.” That’s a generous bequest that would help her set up her own household when the time came that her term of indenture was complete.


Transcription of Will of George Harlan

I George Harlan of Brandywine Creek and in the Township of Kennett and the County of Chester in the province of Pennsylvania, Yeoman. Being weak at this time in body but of sound and disposing mind and memory & calling to mind the certainty of Death & the uncertainty of the time thereof doe make & ordain this my last will & Testament in manner & form following, that is to say, first I yield my soul into the hands of Almighty God as unto a faithful Creator hoping through the merits sufferings resurrection & mediation of my blessed Savior Jesus Christ to find mercy & forgiveness with complete salvation & my body to be buried by my dear wife in the new bearing place on Alphonsus Kirk’s land at the discretion of my executors hereinafter named. Also my will is that all my just debts and funeral expenses be fully paid and discharged. Also I give unto my son Aaron my clock & my great brass cattle. Also I give unto my brother Michael Harlan the young Susquehanna mare. Also I give unto my servant woman named Mary Matthews at the expiration of her time one cow & calf & one young mare not less than three years old. And lastly I make nominate & appoint my sons Ezekiel & Erin Harlan executors of this my last will & testament & also appoint my brother Michael Harlan aforementioned & my son Samuel Hollingsworth trustees & assistance to my executors aforementioned in the performance & accomplishment of this my last will & testament. Also my will is that after my debts legacies bequests & expenses of words that are fully paid and satisfied that what shall then remain of my movable & personal estate if any so there be then it shall be equally divided between all my children sons & daughters share & share alike. In witness thereof I have two this my set will set my hand & seal this one & 20th day of the second month called April in the year of our Lord 1714 George Harlan (seal)

signed sealed & published & declared by the testator George Harlan to be his last Will & Testament in the presence of us who have subscribed our names as witnesses here unto his presence. Daniel McFarson, Nathan Maddock, Thomas Pierson [proven 8 Mo. 2, 1714]

The transcribed inventory of George Harlan's estate, from  History and Genealogy of the Harland Family in America, and particularly of the descendants of George and Michael Harlan, who settled in Chester County PA, 1687, compiled by Alpheus Harlan (The Lord Baltimore Press 1914)
The transcribed inventory of George Harlan's estate, from
History and Genealogy of the Harland Family in America, and particularly of the descendants of George and Michael Harlan, who settled in Chester County PA, 1687, compiled by Alpheus Harlan (The Lord Baltimore Press 1914)
Click to make bigger


------------
* In 17th & 18th century England, a yeoman was a free man who lived in the country and owned his own land and farmed but was not gentry – sort of equivalent to the middle class today). In 18th & 19th century America a yeoman was a non-slaveholding, small landowning, independent, family farmer.

** I’ve seen a lot of trees on Ancestry(.)com referring to George’s baptism date as January 11, 1650, relying on the same record I do, a Quaker record from later in his life from the Philadelphia Meeting, in which his baptism is noted as 11 First 1650. As I explained in the last post (Dating Induced Headaches for the Family Historian: Julian, Gregorian, and Quaker Calendars), before 1752 in England, the Julian Calendar was in use, not the Gregorian Calendar which is currently used today nearly everywhere, and in the Julian Calendar, the first day of the year was March 25. Further, while the Quakers followed the calendar commonly used in the British Isles, the Quaker Calendar had its own quirks. For the Quakers, who designated months by numbers, First month (or 1st mo.) was March. In writing dates, I’ll state what it would be in today’s calendar and then, in parentheses, I’ll include the date as I found it in the source used.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
 I apologize for the spacing changes. Every time I tried to fix it it got worse. I gave up.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Quaker meeting records, 1681-1935, ancestry.com, Provo, Utah, USA; History and Genealogy of the Harland Family in America, and particularly of the descendants of George and Michael Harlan, who settled in Chester County PA, 1687, compiled by Alpheus Harlan (The Lord Baltimore Press 1914); Marriage Record, quicker records collection at FindMyPast(.)com, Ireland, Society of Friends “Quaker” marriages, Ulster Friends Trustees, LTD, marriage, 1674-1750, Ireland, Society of Friends (Quaker) marriages, Life Events (Birth, Marriage, Death), Parrish Marriages, Ireland; “A Great Cry of Oppression” by William Stockdale (London 1693); The History of Chester County, Pennsylvania, with genealogical and biographical sketches, by J. Smith Futhey and Gilbert Cope (Philadelphia, Louis H. Everts 1881); Immigration of the Irish Quakers in Pennsylvania, 1682-1750, with their early History in Ireland, by Albert Cook Myers, member of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania (The Author, Swarthmore PA 1902); The Quakers in America, by Thomas D Hamm, The Columbia Contemporary American Religion Series (Columbia University Press New York 2003); The History of the Hunt Family by Roger D Hunt (copyright 2011) (http://family.beacondeacon.com/the-history-of-the-hunt-family-by-roger-d-hunt-2011-at-www-k7mex-com-books-HuntBookComplete.pdf); Quakers in Delaware in the Time of William Penn by Herbert Standing (http://nc-chap.org/church/quaker/standingDH3crop.pdf); Quakers in Great Britain 1650s-1750s (https://haygenealogy.com/hay/quaker/quaker-GB.html) ; Stook (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stook); YM Sufferings c. 1665-1693, for 1680, 1682, 1683, and 1684, YM-G1, Religious Society of Friends in Ireland Archives, Findmypast.com; “Early Relations between Pennsylvania and Delaware” by The Hon. Richard S. Rodney, John Moll, and William Penn, The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 54, No. 3. pp 209-240 (1930) (found on JSTOR.org); https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_Government_of_Pennsylvania ; Charter of Privileges https://www.ushistory.org/documents/charter.htm

Saturday, May 14, 2016

William Bennett (1806-1890) Revisited, Part Two: Weighing Direct Evidence, Circumstantial Evidence, Scientific Evidence, and Historical Context in Consideration of a Hypothesis.

Climbing My Family Tree: Is This Connection Correct?
Is This Connection Correct?

I am not a genealogist. I am a genealogy hobbyist who works in state agency law in my regular job. I am used to working with evidence, analyzing it, coming to conclusions about its credibility, and determining whether it adds up to anything in particular. Working in agency law I’m used to working with the “substantial evidence” standard, which is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept is adequate to support a conclusion” (more than a “mere scintilla” of evidence).  In making a decision on a case, it is required that there be evidence in support of the conclusion, that I can cite the source of that evidence and  that I explain how the evidence supports my decision. Since this is what I’m used to, this is how I approach my family history hobby.


Another thing that I am used to in my job is bouncing difficult cases off my coworkers or supervisors to see if they can poke holes in my thinking, or whether simply “thinking out loud” can help me get un-stuck on an issue. So in this post, I am “thinking out loud” and seeking feedback from anyone who reads this. 


Before I start talking about my hypothesis want to give a brief definition of the sort of evidence I talk about in the title of this post. I’m largely using the categories I named in a broad sense:


·        “Direct evidence” provides proof about a fact in question or answers a specific, stated question, without requiring us to make any assumptions or draw any inferences. Classic examples of direct evidence are eyewitness testimony, photographs or video of the perpetrator “in the act” or incriminating statements made by a person involved in the matter. In terms of genealogy, wherein most the people I’m looking at are dead, direct evidence would be eyewitness written statements/notations of events or the portion of the death certificate filled out by the doctor as to cause of death and date of death, or basically, anything which relies on the personal knowledge or observation of the writer and gives a definite conclusion.


·        “Circumstantial evidence” or “indirect evidence” relies on inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact. It indirectly proves the fact supports the theory. The more circumstantial evidence there is that tends to support X, the stronger your case. While the media tends to say things like “they only have circumstantial evidence” rather dismissively, circumstantial evidence is not a lesser form of evidence. Eyewitness testimonials are not necessarily always credible or correct, and circumstantial evidence can build a better case, with the caveat that interpretation is key – a misinterpretation can color the whole case and lead to an incorrect conclusion.

·        “Scientific evidence” is actually circumstantial evidence. I separated it out in the title because it occupies a separate stage of thinking for me in this case and I will treat the DNA evidence in a separate section of this post.


·        “Historical context” and/or “cultural context” can inform one’s interpretation of evidence, and it can also help determine whether the evidence is credible or not. Failure to try to understand the context in which events occurred makes coming to a fair or correct conclusion much harder.

-----------------------

Hypothesis: The parents of William Bennett (1806 Ireland-1890 Michigan, USA) are Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston (daughter of Edward Hingston and Lucretia Sewell) of Schull, County Cork, Ireland.


Background: In most of the family trees I have seen which lead up to my second great-grandfather William Bennett (1806 Ireland-1890 Michigan, USA) as a common ancestor, William’s parents are listed as Thomas and Laura Bennett, and born in Northern Ireland or Ulster County, Ireland. I believe that is based on William’s obituary and his death certificate.


His obituary appeared in the Imlay City Times on January 8, 1891, as follows (underlining mine):
Died at his home south-west of Deanville, Mr. William Bennett, Sr., on Dec. 29, 1890. Mr. Bennett was born in the northern part of Ireland about 1808. He emigrated to Montreal, Canada, while quite young, where he remained until 1869, when he moved to his farm near Deanville. He has raised a family of 12 children, all of whom have left and established homes of their own except the youngest, who still remains with his mother on the homestead. He was respected by his neighbors as an honest upright man and will be missed, for he always had a pleasant word for everybody.


His death record lists his mother as Laura Bennett.

 
Climbing My Family Tree: Michigan Death Record of William Bennett, 27 Dec 1890
Michigan Death Record of William Bennett, 27 Dec 1890
Click to make bigger


However, in most of the trees that I have seen where they are coming down to William as a sibling or child of their direct ancestor, having gone up another branch of the tree, William’s parents are listed as Thomas Bennett and Laura Hingston of County Cork, Ireland.


Originally, I had no reason to doubt the obituary or the death certificate notations, even though I know them to be hearsay or speculative evidence, at best, depending on the knowledge of the person who gave the information included in the obituary and the death certificate. That is generally the deceased person’s child, although not always, and I have seen often enough in the course of my family history explorations that the children don’t necessarily know that much about their parents origins and fill out the death certificate or the obituary with incorrect information (sometimes close but not quite right – Heck, until I started doing the family history and asking questions, I probably would’ve placed my mother’s birthplace in a different town than that in which she was actually born. It would have been the one in which she grew up, but she wasn’t born there).


Neither the obituary, nor the death certificate – for the particular fact of who is William’s mother – is direct evidence. I haven’t got any direct evidence tending to support my hypothesis. But I haven’t got any direct evidence refuting it either.


The first inkling I had that basing the facts in my entry on the  William Bennett in my family tree on the obituary and the death certificate might be part of the reason I hadn’t been able to find out anything more about him and might be leading to the dissemination of incorrect information, came when I was contacted by Beverly Jones through my Ancestrydotcom tree, when she said, “If your red puzzle piece with the caption "is this connection correct" is an invitation to weigh in, I'd like to respond I think it is correct that William Bennett's parents were Thomas Bennett and "Laura." Perhaps she was called "Laura", but I think her full name was Lucretia Hingston, and if so, she was the sister of my second great-grandmother Dorothy "Dorah" Hingston Abbott, who lived in the same area of Quebec. I believe William Bennett's brother was Andrew Bennett, who married Dorah's daughter, Ann Abbott (first cousins). Perhaps you know all of this, but I'm willing to share if you don't. I found you through a DNA connection of [my Dad’s test*] with [LK*] & [P2*], who are also DNA matches to me.” (I have permission to use Beverly’s name in this post but have not asked whether I could use the name or identifier of the persons in the brackets, so I’ve made them less identifiable.)


Among the things Beverly shared with me was an AncestryDNA-style DNA circle made up of Hingston-Sewell DNA connections [Lucretia Hingston's parents]  -- it is too far out from both of us for Ancestry to have made one. The below illustration shows a modified copy of the one she sent me (again, I don’t have permission from everyone included to use their name/identifier in this blog post so I have made them less identifiable). The changes I have made are basically cosmetic; this is her work. [Note: this is based on Pre-Change AncestryDNA information. I’ve checked to the extent I can and the connections are still there.]

Beverly Jones' Hingston-Sewell DNA Circle
Used with permission
Click to Make Bigger


This pretty much convinced me that I do descend from Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston. But, this is only one piece of evidence and it is not direct definitive evidence, as we could be connected at a further level up. I’ve since checked my uncle’s and my aunts’ DNA for shared matches with any of the above-listed people and the graphic representation of the circle turned into quite the spider web with so many lines it is difficult to read in a hand-drawn picture, so while the connections are even stronger, particularly as to the Andrew Bennett (1796-1895) group, I decided to post only the original of the line drawing Beverly sent me (edited version) as the illustration here.


So far I have not found a single direct record connecting my William with Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston Bennett of Cork. But circumstantial evidence is good evidence, too, and it is starting to pile up.


For me, one of the most convincing pieces of circumstantial evidence is the listing of Thomas and Lucretia’s children versus the listing of William Bennett and Margaret McFarlane Bennett’s children. (I’ve found baptism or marriage records of many of William’s purported siblings, connecting them with Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston.)


The children of Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston are (not necessarily in the right order) as follows:

Andrew,
William, 
Thomas, 
Dorothy, 
Frances, 
Sarah, 
Catherine, 
Eliza, and 
Mary. 
(Please also keep in mind that Lucretia’s parents are Edward and Lucretia.)


The children of my William Bennett and Margaret McFarlane are:

Mary Jane McFarlane, 
Charlotte Margaret, 
Thomas, 
Elizabeth, 
Janet (“Jenny”), 
Dorothy, 
Andrew, 
Sarah, 
William, 
John Edward, 
Lucretia Anne, and 
James R. 
(Notably, not a single “Laura” among them.)


The two lists are remarkably similar, with the addition of Lucretia (William’s mother and maternal grandmother, if my hypothesis is correct) and Edward as part of John Edward  (Edward would be William’s maternal grandfather under this theory). When I ran preliminary incarnation [mentioning only one DNA connection] of my attempts to work out this hypothesis by a genea-blogger friend who lives in Ireland (Dara, of the Black Raven Genealogy blog ), she told me, “Along with everything else, the strongest evidence in support of the theory, in my opinion, are the two daughters Lucretia and Dorothy. In Ireland, there was little variety in given names, most especially for girls. e.g. one in five girls was called Mary, and one in six boys, John. Very few people were named outside the top ten common names of each sex.  Lucretia and even Dorothy were rare names (probably gentry) in Ireland. It's a huge coincidence if the two families shared these names by chance, as well as all the more common ones.  Naming conventions, eldest son after paternal grandfather, etc) provide clues but in reality were not always followed.”


She also told me that Bennett is an Anglo-Irish name from before the Cromwell conquest, and so originally Catholic. She said it was originally common around Kilkenny from the 14th century, according to MacLysaght (upon looking up that name I discovered that MacLysaght is the absolute expert on Irish surnames and that his books cost a fortune so I’m going to see whether his stuff is available through interlibrary loan at my local library). Dara said Hingston is probably English and is not common in Ireland. (Beverly has found a lot of information on the Hingston family which she has been sending me links to – fascinating stuff, which confirms English roots.)


Beverly had told me that her research, and a letter from a neighbor of the parents mentioning the sons, showed the three sons of Thomas Bennett (Sr.) left Ireland to move to North America (to what became Canada). So I started trying to see if I could find Andrew Bennett or Thomas Bennett Jr, or the three of them traveling from Ireland to the British colonies in North America. I have been so far unsuccessful in finding any ships manifests or other such records showing the three of them traveling together, or separately, to the British colonies in America. I will keep looking for ships records.


I have been able to find Andrew Bennett in Lower Canada. Andrew Bennett lived in the same area as my William Bennett in Lower Canada. In fact, on page 335 of the History of Huntingdon and the Seigniories of Beauharnois and Chateauguay by Robert Sellar. in its end of the chapter list of first occupants of lots in North Georgetown, 1st concession, it shows Andrew Bennett as part tenant (with Neil McNaughton) of the same lot number as I later found William owned according to the English transcription of the Cadastre Abrege for 1854 for North Georgetown (see William Bennett, Revisited, Part One). The history book also shows that lot (#22) is two lots away from that owned by the man who became William’s father-in-law, Andrew McFarlane. Lot #22 was first occupied around 1830. (Prior to the Rebellions of 1837 and 1838, the Seigniories operated as a feudal-style land system, as described in Part One, and it was not possible to own the lot free and clear. I understand that that was changed by the British government after the rebellions, and it became possible to purchase the land.) At the time William owned lot #22 in the first concession, Andrew owned lot 1 in the 3rd concession of the same town.
 
Battle of St. Denis, Contemporary Watercolor, In the Public Domain.

I discovered that Andrew Bennett served in the same local militia that William Bennett did during the uprising of 1838, in the Beauharnois Loyal Volunteers, the Beauharnois Battalion, 1st company, Georgetown). They were both privates. 

I also found a mention of Andrew Bennett and his wife, Ann Abbott, “of County Cork,” in A History of Northwest Missouri as the parents of Charles Bennett. The history indicated that Andrew (born in 1797) and Ann (born in 1817) were both from County Cork, Ireland, were married in Canada in 1833, and that Andrew Bennett had emigrated to North America at the age of 34. Andrew Bennett would’ve been 34 in approximately 1831. In 1831, my William would’ve been approximately 25 years old if he came to North America with Andrew Bennett. Age 25, this would probably comport with the line in William's obituary stating that he “emigrated to Montreal, Canada, while quite young.” It is worth noting that Ann Abbott is listed as the godmother of William Bennett and Margaret McFarlane’s son Thomas. (I also note that, as described above, Beverly Jones is descended from John Abbott and Dorah Hingston. As noted, Dorah is Lucretia’s sister, so it would appear that the Abbotts intertwine with the family on more than one generation.)


Andrew Bennett died in 1865. It is shortly after this time that William Bennett and his family moved to Michigan, USA.


I haven’t been able to find record of anyone I can definitively say is William’s brother, Thomas Bennett (hereinafter TBj) in the British colonies in North America although I did find his baptism record showing him to have been born to Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston (– the index says Houghton but the document itself clearly says Hingston – and baptized on 21 July 1810 in Schull, County Cork, Ireland). I have found a few possibilities and have a favorite, but I’m not sure enough to add the information to his entry on my tree yet. My possibilities include: 1) There is a Tom Bennett in the 1851 New Brunswick census who is Irish and born in the same year TBj was baptized living with a Graham family, but why would he be in New Brunswick as a laborer when the rest of his family is southwest of Montreal? 2) There are two Thomas Bennetts in several censuses and death records in Canada West/Ontario, born within two years either side of TBj’s baptism date, but both list their place of birth as England throughout the censuses [in the death records one in listed as English and the other Irish] and belong to the Church of England, so I’m thinking possible but not necessarily probable. 3) [Admittedly, my favorite] is an 1832 burial record for a Thomas Bennett, age 24, who died in the Emigrant’s Hospital on 18th and was buried on the 20th day of January 1832.  In the 1830s, all who emigrated to Lower Canada (now Quebec) from the British isles were quarantined on Gross Isle in the Quebec Harbor in the St. Lawrence River, one ship at a time (other ships had to wait their turn), until the ship, its passengers, crew and all their bedding and clothing had been scrubbed and approved by government inspectors. Any who showed signs of disease were detained in the Emigrant’s Hospital on the Island.  This Thomas Bennett’s listed age in the index would have him born within 2 years of TBj’s baptism. I like this one because he is at least in the same province as his putative brothers, and because it explains not being able to find him in the same area as William in the years to come. It’s tragic, but plausible.


Climbing My Family Tree: Map of Ireland, 1830
Map of Ireland, 1830
Click to make bigger


One of the main problems with my hypothesis versus William Bennett’s obituary is that County Cork is not in northern Ireland. This is where a little consideration of historical context may supply some reasons for the difference in the obituary. First, Northern Ireland as a separate political entity did not exist until 1921, thirty-one years after William died. Prior to that, saying someone was from northern Ireland was a common reference point indicating that the person was likely from County Ulster and not Catholic. I have been unable to find a Thomas and Laura Bennett from County Ulster, in the correct time frame, or anywhere in that timeframe, for that matter. Under my hypothesis, William came to British North America when he was approximately 21, based on the information on Andrew in his son's, Charles’ write-up, in the History of Northwest Missouri, about a decade before the Famine, in the early 1830’s when Irish immigration to Canada was substantially Catholic. In the first census in which I found William in Canada East, the 1851 census, he and his family were listed as Catholic. It is unlikely to be a census taker’s mistake as others on the same page were listed as Presbyterian. True, on later U.S, censuses, William, and his family were listed as Protestant/Church of Scotland. When I wrote to Dara, of Black Raven Genealogy, she reminded me that there were strong anti-Irish sentiments in the post-Famine era both in Canada and the USA, so that it was not abnormal for an Irishman to claim northern roots in order to avoid being tarred with the poor Famine-immigrant brush. Some of her own ancestors who emigrated to the US did so, claiming to be Scots-Irish (which means northern Irish, and Protestant). Moreover, I note that in the mid-to-late 19th century there was also a strong Anti-Catholic bias in the U.S.A. It is possible that William changed his religion to that of his wife in order to avoid discrimination, and that the obituary writer simply presumed he was from northern Ireland because he was Protestant during the time the composer of the obituary knew him. Being originally Catholic when he emigrated could also explain the delayed marriage indicated in his son Thomas’ baptism record (see Part One) since the Catholic Church in British Canada did not like marriages between Catholics and non-Catholics, and the priest may have refused to marry them. The Church of Scotland was less stringent as to mixed marriages in that time. It is possible that they married in the Protestant church after giving up on being able to be married in the Catholic Church – after the birth of three kids (two daughters, Mary Jane and Charlotte Margaret, and his son, Thomas).

Taken together, these are my reasons for believing that my second-great-grandfather's parents are Thomas Bennett and Lucretia Hingston of Schull, County Cork, Ireland instead of Thomas Bennett and Laura [?] of somewhere in northern Ireland. Does this make sense to you? I’d truly appreciate it if you would leave your thoughts in the comments below, whether you agree with me or not. In fact, particularly if you do not, and especially if you can state reasons. I’d also appreciate it if anyone can give me ideas of where to look next. And if anyone is descended from William’s putative brother Thomas and knows where he went to, or from any of the girls, I would love to hear from you. If you think we might share DNA, I administer my Dad’s and his sibling’s DNA kits as well, and they are all up on AncestryDNA and GEDmatch. Please feel free to contact me by leaving a comment or emailing me at the address at the “Contact Me” tab above.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The History of Huntingdon and the Seigniories of Beauharnois and Chateauguay, From Their First Settlement to the Year 1838 and Revised to the 1900s by Robert Sellar, p.335 (150th anniversary edition, the Gleaner, Huntingdon, Québec, June 1975; originally published by Huntingdon, Québec, the Huntingdon Gleaner Incorporated. 1888.); transcription of the Cadastre Abrege for 1854, http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~qcchatea/cadastre/ngeorge3.htm; Transcribed militia pay lists for companies in the Beauharnois Battalion during the Rebellion of 1838, http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~qcchatea/1838pay.htm#first ; A History of Northwest Missouri, Vol. 3, pp. 1889-1890, ed. by Walter Williams (The Lewis Publishing Company of Chicago & New York, 1915); The church record index at IrishGenealogy.i.e. for Tom Bennett, http://churchrecords.irishgenealogy.ie/churchrecords/details/2e75a70041897; “Life and Death on Gross Isle, 1832-1937”, https://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/grosse-ile/021023-2200-e.html; Les Ecossais, The Pioneer Scots of Lower Canada, 1763-1855, by Lucille H Campey (Natural Heritage, 2006); Courtship, Love, and Marriage in 19th Century English Canada, by Peter Wald (McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1993); Adventures and Exiles: The Great Scottish Exodus (Profile Books, 2003); Ancestry.com. Quebec, Vital and Church Records (Drouin Collection), 1621-1967 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc., 200 - Original data: Gabriel Drouin, comp. Drouin Collection. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Institut Généalogique Drouin; 1851 Census of Canada East, Canada West, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia; U.S. Federal Census for 1870, and 1880; Imlay City Times, January 8, 1891;  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irish_Quebecers;  http://www.irishtimes.com/ancestor/magazine/emigration/pre-fam.htm; http://seekingmichigan.org; Ontario, Canada, Deaths, 1869-1938, Archives of Ontario; Series: MS935; Reel: 61, Ancestry.com;  Ontario, Canada Census for 1871 and 1891.