Used via creative commons license; photograph by WilliamJD |
I don’t think this can be a 52 Ancestors post because I
already wrote about Francis Henn #25 and I think that each of the 52 Ancestors
posts is supposed to be about a different ancestor. However, I found this so
interesting that I had to post about it even though it will put me even further
behind in the challenge.
As I mentioned in the last post I found Francis Henn’s will in the New York, Probate Records, 1629-1971 .
Even though it is short, there are several points about it that I found quite
interesting. As his will was created on the day of his death, it is likely possible that he knew he was dying and had summoned a lawyer to his side to take down his will. This was not an uncommon occurrence in the 19th century, when even lawyers made house calls (that or he knew the correct legal terminology to use, which is unlikely in a farmer for whom English was a second language).
Index to Wills, Surrogates Court, Oswego County Click to make bigger |
Wills are a method of passing on real and personal property to the
person of your choosing. I was curious as to why it seemed to have taken nearly
seven years to get Francis’ Will probated but in doing some research I
discovered that it wasn’t uncommon for
probate to take up to a year, and under certain situations take much longer. It
is possible (very possible in this case as we’ll see below) that the two witnesses
necessary to prove it, and the ability of the executor to post bond (50% of the
value of the estate unless waived in the will), were not available at the
earliest possible court date. Moreover, Francis died in the middle of the Civil
War; it is also quite possible that Court schedules were disrupted and/or
witnesses were off fighting. Luckily, it was not necessary to probate the Will
in order to empower the executor/executrix to bury the deceased, to pay or to
collect bills, and to otherwise handle the property in the estate pending
probate. That probably alleviated some of the problems of a drawn out probate
in this case as he named his wife, Phillipina, both as Executrix and (initially) sole heir.
This marks Francis as an exceptional man. For most of
history married women could not own or inherit property solely in her own being.
Everything she was given was her husband’s in law. A woman did have a dower
right to a one-third lifetime interest in the marital property (real or
personal) upon the death of her spouse. The lifetime right meant that she could
share in the rents or profits from that property but did not give her title in
it or give her the right to sell or devise (will to someone else) the property.
By law, only males or unmarried women over 18 could devise real property. Married women could devise real property,
even property that was hers before the marriage, only with the written permission
of her husband. Likewise, if a father gave property outright to a married
daughter through inheritance, the daughter’s husband would have ownership of that
property and could sell or bequeath it to anyone he chose without his wife’s
permission. That is why many 18th & 19th Century
wills show a father leaving the use of personal property to a daughter
for her lifetime, with title to be vested in her children and delivered to them
after her death.
In the 19th Century, that began to change as laws
were passed piecemeal, state-by-state, across the country allowing married
women to own property in their own right. The earliest comprehensive Married
Women’s Property Act was passed in New York State on April 7, 1848. It
significantly changed the law regarding property rights granted to married
women, allowing them to own and control their own property, whether owned before
the marriage, or granted her by gift or inheritance during the marriage by
someone other than her than her husband. Even so, in culture and practice, change,
albeit legal, was slow. Just because it was now legal, did not mean that it was at all common.
But as shown in his will Francis loved his wife and viewed
her as his equal in ability to be responsible for the property, and it showed
that he loved and viewed his sons and daughters equally and as equals.
This first form indicates that Phillipina Henn (#26) appeared in
court on 12 October 1871 and applied to have the last Will and Testament of
Francis Henn proved. The Surrogate ascertained who all the heirs and next of
kin were and required them to appear before him at his office in Sandy Creek NY
on 13 November 1871 to attend the probate of the will. On that day no one
appeared to oppose the probate of the will. So he proceeded to prove the will
in accordance with the law. The will stated as follows:
Last Will and Testament of Francis Henn, signed April 20, 1863 Click to make bigger |
Transcription, to the best of my ability:
WILL
“In the name of God Amen, I, Francis Henn, of the town of
West Monroe in the County of Oswego and state of New York, being a naturalized
citizen of sound mind and memory, blessed be almighty God for the same, do make
and publish this my last Will and Testament in [__?__] and forever
following (what is to say)
First. I give and
devise all of my real property, being the farm whereon I now reside, with the
appendences, to my beloved wife, Phillipina, situated, lying, and being in the
Town of West Monroe, in the County of Oswego and state of New York being part
of lots Nos. 17 and 25, township No. 13 of Scriba’s Patent and bounded as
follows, viz..on the North by Andrew Shillinger, on the East by said Shillinger
and Morris [__?___], on the South by Francis Beresen and W. Brassard and
on the West by said Fr. Berensen and Peter Pettit containing 50 acres of land
be the same either more or less. Forever to have and to hold the same for her
use and support and maintenance forever. Or to sell and dispose of the same at
any time after my decease and live and support herself of the [___?_____],
and if she chooses at anytime to alienate or sell the same (after my decease) I
hereby authorize her as my executrix to give a good warrantee deed and convey
the same in fee simple to the purchaser or purchasers in full and ample manner
as I myself could or would do were I living.
Second. I
give and bequeath unto my said wife, Phillipina, all household goods or
furniture, also all money on hand, money due or to become due either by Notes,
Bonds, Contracts or anyother wise, for her use benefit and support. And after
her decease I will order and direct that that whatever of the [__?___]
of my property shall or may be left, or remain (all her debts, funeral expenses
so first being liquidated and paid) that then, the same shall be equally
divided among my children, viz – Jenefever, Serena, Dorothea, Andres, Generosa,
Josephat, Francis and Josephine, or their heirs in case of either death. Share
and Share alike.
Lastly I do hereby constitute and appoint my said wife
Phillipina sole executrix of this my last Will and Testament hereby revoking
all former wills by me made. In witness whereof I have herewith set my hand and
seal this 20th day of April Anno Domini in One Thousand Eight
Hundred and sixty-three (1863) Francis Henn (F.J.)
Signed, sealed, published and declared by the Testator as
and for his last Will and Testament in the presence of us who at his request in
his presence and in the presence of each
other have subscribed our names as witnesses (___?___) Philip Rea West
Monroe Oswego County NY. John Brickhammer West Monroe, Oswego County New York.”
Francis did not give Phillipina a life estate in the
property, as I initially thought when I saw that he directed the further
devising after her death as well. No, he willed it to her outright, giving her
the ability to keep it for her support during her lifetime or to sell it “as I myself
could or would do were I living”. He
also gave her “all household goods or furniture, also all money on hand, money
due or to become due either by Notes, Bonds, Contracts or anyother wise, for
her use, benefit and support.” This is rather remarkable. He does go on to
direct how the property should be distributed after Phillipina’s death if any “may
be left, or remain (all her debts, funeral expenses so first being liquidated
and paid)”, but remember, married women did not have the right or ability to
devise or will property in New York except as set forth in that 1848 law, which
specifically excluded property gifted by a woman’s husband.
Even at that point, he shows that he is a loving and fair
father, and an extraordinary man for that time, who saw his daughters as equal
to his sons, “the same shall be equally divided among my children, viz – Jenefever,
Serena, Dorothea, Andres, Generosa, Josephat, Francis and Josephine, or their
heirs in case of either death. Share and Share alike"; the 1848 law allowing his
bequest to his daughters to be their sole property and not automatically that
of their husbands. (Edmund had predeceased his father, Francis, with no
marriage or children.)
Witness Attestations proving the Will of Francis Henn (the top two affidavitts & writing down the side margin) Click to ake bigger |
The last form, after the will was set forth, consists of
witness statements and may give a hint as to why it took nearly seven years to
get the will probated. It starts out
perfectly normally as the first of the witnesses to the signing of the will,
Philip Rea, attests that he witnessed the signature of the deceased, who was
over 21, of sound mind, memory, and
understanding, and not under any restraint, and competent to devise real
estate. However, Philip Rea also attests that the other witness was John
Brickhammer, who is now deceased. So they needed to find someone else who had
no interest in the will but who could identify Francis Henn’s signature to
prove that it was his will.
In that cramped bit of writing in what would have been the
white space between form affidavits is the written affidavit of Andrew
Shillinger – I believe he is the person the will indicated was Francis’
northern neighbor. The affidavit, as
best as I can read it states as follows:
“Oswego County SS: Andrew Shillinger being duly sworn says that he was
acquainted with Francis Henn in his lifetime and with his handwriting and knows
the signature to the above described will is his genuine handwriting as he
believes and that he was also acquainted with John Brickhammer now deceased and
with his handwriting and that his hand name in the said will as a witness is
his genuine handwriting as he verily believes.”
With that, the Surrogate, Henry Le Howe declared the will to
be properly executed, and recorded, signed, and certified the will in
accordance with the provisions of the Revised Statutes, on the 27th
day of November, 1871.
I find it very interesting and inspiring to know that we (my
Dad, my aunts, my uncle, my brothers, my cousins & I) come from such a
loving forward thinking man. It is so moving to me to realize that my
great-great-great-grandfather so valued the women in his life that in a
time when women were largely considered, at best, “child-like” in their
comprehension, ability, and responsibility, and, at worst, “property”, he saw
and treated them as equal to himself and his sons. With this sort of legacy, no
wonder my Dad is such a wonderful, remarkable man in his own right.
-------------------------
"New
York, Probate Records, 1629-1971," images, FamilySearch (
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1942-24574-23242-84?cc=1920234&wc=9VSS-824:213301201,214361501
: accessed 27 Jul 2014), Oswego > Will index 1816-1915 > image 63 of 153.; "New York, Probate Records,
1629-1971," images, FamilySearch
(https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.3.1/TH-1951-24578-33399-10?cc=1920234&wc=9VS7-BZS:213301201,214485401
: accessed 05 Aug 2014), Oswego > Wills 1865-1872 vol J-K > image 522 &
523 of 717; http://www.genfiles.com/articles/wills-intestates-probate/;
http://www.genfiles.com/articles/womens-rights/
; http://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/wes/collections/women_law/;
http://www.library.hbs.edu/hc/wes/collections/women_finance_investment/
; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_Women's_Property_Acts_in_the_United_States
; http://www.familytreemagazine.com/Article/probate-records-workbook
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hello! Thanks for stopping by and choosing to leave a message. I read every message and I usually reply via the comment thread. [I recently discovered that I've been having technical difficulties with receiving notification of comments for the last year (2019 through Jan 2020). I think I've fixed that now. I hope. My apologies if you were caught up in that. I think I"ve caught up with, and replied to, all the comments now. EDIT: I continue to have problems. I will respond as soon as I find out there's been a comment.]